Difference between revisions of "Cooling Plates"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
385 bytes removed ,  00:55, 2 January 2013
no edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Cooling]]{{Knoppen}}
[[Category:Cooling]]{{Knoppen}}
<noinclude><!------------------------------------------------
* READ THIS FIRST
* Only edit this page if you can improve the content.
* Improper use of this page will lead to permanent banning.
* Please do not edit the sponsored link on the top right corner.
* Please start editing this page after the /noinclude
* -------------------------------------------------></noinclude>
[[File:Cooling plate.jpg|thumb|right|Cooling Plates]]
[[File:Cooling plate.jpg|thumb|right|Cooling Plates]]
[[File:Aluminum cooling plates.JPG|thumb|right|Aluminum Cooling Plates]]
[[File:Aluminum cooling plates.JPG|thumb|right|Aluminum Cooling Plates]]
In a world of compact designs with increasing power densities, '''Cooling Plates'''  are satisfying demanding contact cooling requirements in applications as diverse as high-powered electronics, lasers, power drives, medical equipment, and military and aerospace. For high watt densities, when air-cooled heat sinks are inadequate, liquid-cooled cooling  plates are the ideal high-performance heat transfer solution.
In a world of compact designs with increasing power densities, '''Cooling Plates'''  are satisfying demanding contact cooling requirements in applications as diverse as high-powered electronics, lasers, power drives, medical equipment, and military and aerospace. For high watt densities, when air-cooled heat sinks are inadequate, liquid-cooled cooling  plates are the ideal high-performance heat transfer solution.


Cooling plate graphs  compares the normalized thermal resistances of different cooling plate technologies, enabling thermal performances to be compared independently of the cooling  plate part geometries. The lower the thermal resistance, the better the performance of the cooling  plate. All cooling plate performances are compared using water as the cooling fluid.
Cooling plate graphs  compares the normalized thermal resistances of different cooling plate technologies, enabling thermal performances to be compared independently of the cooling  plate part geometries. The lower the thermal resistance, the better the performance of the cooling  plate. All cooling plate performances are compared using water as the cooling fluid.


Coolant compatibility with cooling  plate wetted surfaces must be considered when selecting a cooling plate technology. A copper fluid path is compatible with water and most common coolants. Aluminum offers excellent performance with ethylene glycol and water solutions (EGW), oils, and other fluids, but is not compatible with untreated water. A stainless steel fluid path is recommended when using deionized water or other corrosive fluids within a cold plate.
Coolant compatibility with cooling  plate wetted surfaces must be considered when selecting a cooling plate technology. A copper fluid path is compatible with water and most common coolants. Aluminum offers excellent performance with ethylene glycol and water solutions (EGW), oils, and other fluids, but is not compatible with untreated water. A stainless steel fluid path is recommended when using deionized water or other corrosive fluids within a cold plate.

Navigation menu